<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "../../nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">109</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:3dc5f44e-8666-58db-bc76-a455210e8891</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">jucs</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0948-695X</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">0948-6968</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Journal of Universal Computer Science</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3217/jucs-020-13-1738</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">23817</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>C.2.1 - Network Architecture and Design</subject>
          <subject>C.2.3 - Network Operations</subject>
          <subject>C.2.4 - Distributed Systems</subject>
          <subject>C.2.m - Miscellaneous</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Understanding Collaboration in Volunteer Computing Systems</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Vega</surname>
            <given-names>Davide</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">dvega@ac.upc.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Meseguer</surname>
            <given-names>Roc</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Freitag</surname>
            <given-names>Felix</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ochoa</surname>
            <given-names>Sergio F.</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain</addr-line>
        <institution>Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Barcelona</addr-line>
        <country>Spain</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile</addr-line>
        <institution>Universidad de Chile</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Santiago</addr-line>
        <country>Chile</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Davide Vega (<email xlink:type="simple">dvega@ac.upc.edu</email>).</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: </p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>28</day>
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>1738</fpage>
      <lpage>1765</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/8D023637-B438-5A3E-9F00-E2D999E2DA81">8D023637-B438-5A3E-9F00-E2D999E2DA81</uri>
      <uri content-type="zenodo_dep_id" xlink:href="https://zenodo.org/record/5505953">5505953</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>29</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2014</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>06</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2014</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Davide Vega, Roc Meseguer, Felix Freitag, Sergio F. Ochoa</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This article is freely available under the J.UCS Open Content License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>Volunteer computing is a paradigm in which devices participating in a distributed environment share part of their resources to help others perform their activities. The effectiveness of this computing paradigm depends on the collaboration attitude adopted by the participating devices. Unfortunately for software designers it is not clear how to contribute with local resources to the shared environment without compromising resources that could then be required by the contributors. Therefore, many designers adopt a conservative position when defining the collaboration strategy to be embedded in volunteer computing applications. This position produces an underutilization of the devices local resources and reduces the effectiveness of these solutions. This article presents a study that helps designers understand the impact of adopting a particular collaboration attitude to contribute with local resources to the distributed shared environment. The study considers five collaboration strategies, which are analyzed in computing environments with both, abundance and scarcity of resources. The obtained results indicate that collaboration strategies based on effort-based incentives work better than those using contribution-based incentives. These results also show that the use of effort-based incentives does not jeopardize the availability of local resources for the local needs.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
