<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "../../nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">109</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:3dc5f44e-8666-58db-bc76-a455210e8891</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">jucs</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0948-695X</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">0948-6968</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Journal of Universal Computer Science</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3217/jucs-004-02-0147</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">27469</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Constructive Error Analysis</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Krämer</surname>
            <given-names>Walter</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">walter.kraemer@math.uni-karlsruhe.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Institut für Wissenschaftliches Rechnen und Mathematische Modellbildung (IWRMM), Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany</addr-line>
        <institution>Institut für Wissenschaftliches Rechnen und Mathematische Modellbildung (IWRMM), Universität Karlsruhe</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Karlsruhe</addr-line>
        <country>Germany</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Walter Krämer (<email xlink:type="simple">walter.kraemer@math.uni-karlsruhe.de</email>).</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: </p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>1998</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>28</day>
        <month>02</month>
        <year>1998</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>147</fpage>
      <lpage>163</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/326FEAF2-0006-54A4-B416-61A4264845EF">326FEAF2-0006-54A4-B416-61A4264845EF</uri>
      <uri content-type="zenodo_dep_id" xlink:href="https://zenodo.org/record/6995514">6995514</uri>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Walter Krämer</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This article is freely available under the J.UCS Open Content License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>Rigorous a priori error bounds for floating-point computations are derived. We will show that using interval tools in combination with function and operator overloading such bounds can be computed on a computer automatically in a very convenient way. The bounds are of worst case type. They hold uniformly for the specified domain of input values. That means, whenever the floating point computation is repeated later on with any set of point input values from that domain the difference of the exact result and the computed result is guaranteed to be smaller than the a priori error bound. Our techniques can be used to get reliable a priori error bounds for already existing program code. Here, loops, recursion, and iterations are allowed. To demonstrate the power of the methods several examples are given.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
